<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1194 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242979</link>
    <description>The case involved an RTI application seeking extensive information on the Empowered Committee on GSTN and SPV. The CPIO offered inspection and partial disclosure of documents, leading to an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The Authority upheld the CPIO&#039;s decision, prompting the appellant to argue that inspection offer constituted full disclosure. Allegations of mechanical decision-making were made against the Authority, resulting in the quashing of their order. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for diligent quasi-judicial roles and proper application of mind. The Appellate Authority was cautioned for violating the RTI Act, stressing the importance of proper decision-making processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1194 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242979</link>
      <description>The case involved an RTI application seeking extensive information on the Empowered Committee on GSTN and SPV. The CPIO offered inspection and partial disclosure of documents, leading to an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The Authority upheld the CPIO&#039;s decision, prompting the appellant to argue that inspection offer constituted full disclosure. Allegations of mechanical decision-making were made against the Authority, resulting in the quashing of their order. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for diligent quasi-judicial roles and proper application of mind. The Appellate Authority was cautioned for violating the RTI Act, stressing the importance of proper decision-making processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>