<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1191 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242976</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the levy of surcharge on undisclosed income before 1.6.2002, affirming that surcharge was not applicable for searches conducted prior to that date. Additionally, the appeal was deemed not maintainable based on the CBDT&#039;s monetary limits, as the tax effect fell below the prescribed threshold, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1191 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242976</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the levy of surcharge on undisclosed income before 1.6.2002, affirming that surcharge was not applicable for searches conducted prior to that date. Additionally, the appeal was deemed not maintainable based on the CBDT&#039;s monetary limits, as the tax effect fell below the prescribed threshold, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>