<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1187 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242972</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to be heard before the impugned assessment orders were passed by the Assessing Officer for multiple years. The Court stayed the orders, directing the petitioner to appear before the Assessing Officer without a fresh notice. The Assessing Officer was instructed to consider the case, incorporating previous directions from higher authorities. The Assessing Officer could modify the orders after providing a fair hearing to the petitioner. No immediate action was to be taken based on the impugned orders until new orders were passed post the petitioner&#039;s hearing. The writ petitions were disposed of with these directions, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1187 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242972</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the petitioner was not given a fair opportunity to be heard before the impugned assessment orders were passed by the Assessing Officer for multiple years. The Court stayed the orders, directing the petitioner to appear before the Assessing Officer without a fresh notice. The Assessing Officer was instructed to consider the case, incorporating previous directions from higher authorities. The Assessing Officer could modify the orders after providing a fair hearing to the petitioner. No immediate action was to be taken based on the impugned orders until new orders were passed post the petitioner&#039;s hearing. The writ petitions were disposed of with these directions, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>