<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242969</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue challenging the validity of a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting the conditions of section 36(2) for claiming deductions under section 36(1)(vii). The decision highlighted the necessity of providing detailed evidence to support deduction claims, particularly regarding the nature of debts written off. The case underscored the need for a thorough examination of all aspects of a claim to ensure compliance with legal requirements. The matter was remanded back for further examination regarding a specific sum related to miscellaneous balances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242969</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue challenging the validity of a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting the conditions of section 36(2) for claiming deductions under section 36(1)(vii). The decision highlighted the necessity of providing detailed evidence to support deduction claims, particularly regarding the nature of debts written off. The case underscored the need for a thorough examination of all aspects of a claim to ensure compliance with legal requirements. The matter was remanded back for further examination regarding a specific sum related to miscellaneous balances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>