<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1179 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer should have considered the rectified computation of income submitted by the assessee during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, recognizing the additional expenses claimed, emphasizing the duty of the Assessing Officer to address rectifications to prevent prejudice to taxpayers due to inadvertent errors in original returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1179 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer should have considered the rectified computation of income submitted by the assessee during assessment proceedings. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, recognizing the additional expenses claimed, emphasizing the duty of the Assessing Officer to address rectifications to prevent prejudice to taxpayers due to inadvertent errors in original returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>