<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242963</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, and penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by falsely claiming exemption under Section 10(38) were upheld. The Tribunal found the assessees&#039; repeated claims and lack of bona fide belief indicated a deliberate attempt to evade tax, aligning with precedent. The importance of accurate tax filings and taxpayer responsibility was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1178 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242963</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, and penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by falsely claiming exemption under Section 10(38) were upheld. The Tribunal found the assessees&#039; repeated claims and lack of bona fide belief indicated a deliberate attempt to evade tax, aligning with precedent. The importance of accurate tax filings and taxpayer responsibility was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>