<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1164 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered the provisions of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, finding the total sale value of traded goods was considered in confirming the demand. The applicant&#039;s offer to deposit Rs.50 lakhs for the appeal hearing was deemed sufficient. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit the amount within eight weeks, after which pre-deposit of remaining dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. Appeals were scheduled for hearing upon compliance by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1164 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered the provisions of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, finding the total sale value of traded goods was considered in confirming the demand. The applicant&#039;s offer to deposit Rs.50 lakhs for the appeal hearing was deemed sufficient. The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit the amount within eight weeks, after which pre-deposit of remaining dues would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal&#039;s pendency. Appeals were scheduled for hearing upon compliance by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>