https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242947 The appellant's argument that the product is classified under Chapter 28 as Hydrated Lime was rejected, with the Revenue contending it falls under Calcium Hydroxide. The judgment focused on the dispute over product classification, the invocation of a longer limitation period for demand, and the pre-deposit amount waiver. The appellant was directed to make a specified deposit within 12 weeks, with the remaining amount waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed during the appeal process. The decision clarified the classification issue and outlined the conditions for pre-deposit waiver, ensuring a fair resolution. en-us Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:51:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242947 The appellant's argument that the product is classified under Chapter 28 as Hydrated Lime was rejected, with the Revenue contending it falls under Calcium Hydroxide. The judgment focused on the dispute over product classification, the invocation of a longer limitation period for demand, and the pre-deposit amount waiver. The appellant was directed to make a specified deposit within 12 weeks, with the remaining amount waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed during the appeal process. The decision clarified the classification issue and outlined the conditions for pre-deposit waiver, ensuring a fair resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242947