https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242942 The Tribunal held that a strong prima facie case existed for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty and penalties in the stay proceedings because the dispute was covered by an earlier ruling on the treatment of rectified spirit and credit under Rule 6. It also considered that the appellants had already reversed credit substantially by paying 5% of the value of rectified spirit cleared. On that basis, unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted and the stay petitions were allowed. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:51:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242942 The Tribunal held that a strong prima facie case existed for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty and penalties in the stay proceedings because the dispute was covered by an earlier ruling on the treatment of rectified spirit and credit under Rule 6. It also considered that the appellants had already reversed credit substantially by paying 5% of the value of rectified spirit cleared. On that basis, unconditional waiver of pre-deposit was granted and the stay petitions were allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242942