<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1155 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application to dispense with the pre-deposit condition of duty and penalty amounting to Rs.50,86,570 imposed for alleged clandestine removal of final products. Central Excise officers alleged unaccounted ingots and billets were received from the appellants, manufactured into final products, and cleared without duty payment. However, a previous Tribunal order had set aside the demand against another unit involved. The Tribunal found no basis to sustain the allegation against the present appellants, given the earlier decision, and granted an unconditional stay in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:51:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1155 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application to dispense with the pre-deposit condition of duty and penalty amounting to Rs.50,86,570 imposed for alleged clandestine removal of final products. Central Excise officers alleged unaccounted ingots and billets were received from the appellants, manufactured into final products, and cleared without duty payment. However, a previous Tribunal order had set aside the demand against another unit involved. The Tribunal found no basis to sustain the allegation against the present appellants, given the earlier decision, and granted an unconditional stay in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>