<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (12) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161421</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the appellant was entitled to compensation for service lines laid with consumer contributions under Section 7(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, amending the fair market value of the undertaking to Rs. 31,46,887.60. The Court corrected the umpire&#039;s exclusion of the value of service lines, emphasizing that awards can only be set aside for errors of law apparent on the face of the award. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 08:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (12) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161421</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the appellant was entitled to compensation for service lines laid with consumer contributions under Section 7(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, amending the fair market value of the undertaking to Rs. 31,46,887.60. The Court corrected the umpire&#039;s exclusion of the value of service lines, emphasizing that awards can only be set aside for errors of law apparent on the face of the award. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>