<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1150 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242935</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted a total waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties to an applicant manufacturing oral contraceptives, ruling that their activities qualified as manufacturing under the Central Excise Act. Despite Revenue&#039;s argument that the products were cleared at nil rate of duty, the tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s claim, citing a previous case. The decision highlights the importance of accurate interpretation of exemption notifications and reliance on legal precedents for consistent adjudication. The waiver was granted based on prima facie evidence, demonstrating a balanced approach in addressing the applicant&#039;s claims while upholding legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1150 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242935</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted a total waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties to an applicant manufacturing oral contraceptives, ruling that their activities qualified as manufacturing under the Central Excise Act. Despite Revenue&#039;s argument that the products were cleared at nil rate of duty, the tribunal found merit in the applicant&#039;s claim, citing a previous case. The decision highlights the importance of accurate interpretation of exemption notifications and reliance on legal precedents for consistent adjudication. The waiver was granted based on prima facie evidence, demonstrating a balanced approach in addressing the applicant&#039;s claims while upholding legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>