<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1144 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s prayer to dispense with the pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalty amount. The case involved allegations of providing &#039;rent-a-cab&#039; services without paying Service Tax, which the Revenue failed to prove due to lack of evidence. The demand for the period in question was barred by limitation, and the Service Tax within the limitation period had been deposited by the appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the remaining amount, granting a stay on the recovery process during the appeal. The stay petition was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1144 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s prayer to dispense with the pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalty amount. The case involved allegations of providing &#039;rent-a-cab&#039; services without paying Service Tax, which the Revenue failed to prove due to lack of evidence. The demand for the period in question was barred by limitation, and the Service Tax within the limitation period had been deposited by the appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the remaining amount, granting a stay on the recovery process during the appeal. The stay petition was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>