<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an advertising agency, in a case concerning service tax liability on commission received for providing creative inputs. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not directly provide advertising agency services to clients but rather through a tripartite agreement with another agency. It was determined that the main contractor had paid the Service Tax, supporting the appellant&#039;s position. The Tribunal dispensed with pre-deposit conditions, stayed the recovery of duty and penalty, and allowed the stay petition in favor of the appellant based on the interpretation of the agreement and relevant circulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an advertising agency, in a case concerning service tax liability on commission received for providing creative inputs. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not directly provide advertising agency services to clients but rather through a tripartite agreement with another agency. It was determined that the main contractor had paid the Service Tax, supporting the appellant&#039;s position. The Tribunal dispensed with pre-deposit conditions, stayed the recovery of duty and penalty, and allowed the stay petition in favor of the appellant based on the interpretation of the agreement and relevant circulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>