<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1113 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted an early hearing for a Stay Application filed by the Appellant, who sought waiver of pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Bombay High Court had granted interim stay against recovery proceedings initiated. Acknowledging the delay in listing the Stay Application, the Tribunal fixed a hearing date based on parties&#039; consent and High Court&#039;s directions. The Revenue was barred from taking coercive action until the application was heard, ensuring procedural fairness and timely adjudication. The Miscellaneous Application was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the importance of efficient case management and honoring higher court directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1113 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted an early hearing for a Stay Application filed by the Appellant, who sought waiver of pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Bombay High Court had granted interim stay against recovery proceedings initiated. Acknowledging the delay in listing the Stay Application, the Tribunal fixed a hearing date based on parties&#039; consent and High Court&#039;s directions. The Revenue was barred from taking coercive action until the application was heard, ensuring procedural fairness and timely adjudication. The Miscellaneous Application was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the importance of efficient case management and honoring higher court directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>