https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242895 The judgment granted waiver and stay of dues adjudged against the appellants. The main appellant was found liable for a duty amount, with payment made for the excess quantity but not for unaccounted stock, leading to confiscation. Predeposit was clarified to be required only for duty and penalty, not for confiscated goods. As the duty on excess goods was paid and penalty amount settled, the judge ruled in favor of the appellants, considering the arguments and facts presented. The case concluded with the decision on predeposit requirements, duty, penalty, and confiscation of goods. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242895 The judgment granted waiver and stay of dues adjudged against the appellants. The main appellant was found liable for a duty amount, with payment made for the excess quantity but not for unaccounted stock, leading to confiscation. Predeposit was clarified to be required only for duty and penalty, not for confiscated goods. As the duty on excess goods was paid and penalty amount settled, the judge ruled in favor of the appellants, considering the arguments and facts presented. The case concluded with the decision on predeposit requirements, duty, penalty, and confiscation of goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242895