<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242886</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld a demand of Rs.22,29,549/- and penalty under Section 78 of the Act. The appellant&#039;s plea that the amount was not received during the relevant period was rejected. The liability to remit service tax is not contingent on receipt of the amount by the service provider. The stay application was rejected, and time for deposit of the adjudicated amount was granted for four weeks. Compliance was listed for 5.6.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1101 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242886</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld a demand of Rs.22,29,549/- and penalty under Section 78 of the Act. The appellant&#039;s plea that the amount was not received during the relevant period was rejected. The liability to remit service tax is not contingent on receipt of the amount by the service provider. The stay application was rejected, and time for deposit of the adjudicated amount was granted for four weeks. Compliance was listed for 5.6.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>