<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1074 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal. It was held that the payments were primarily reimbursements, not subject to TDS under Section 194C. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the applicability of Section 172 and Circular No. 723 for payments to non-resident shipping companies. Both appeals by the department were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:32:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1074 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the department&#039;s appeal. It was held that the payments were primarily reimbursements, not subject to TDS under Section 194C. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the applicability of Section 172 and Circular No. 723 for payments to non-resident shipping companies. Both appeals by the department were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>