<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1072 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as the assessee had disclosed all material facts, and the disallowance was due to non-compliance with TDS provisions, considered a technical fault. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2006-07 and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2007-08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:32:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1072 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as the assessee had disclosed all material facts, and the disallowance was due to non-compliance with TDS provisions, considered a technical fault. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2006-07 and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2007-08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>