https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242842 The Tribunal upheld the duty amounting to Rs.69,35,257 confirmed for the period May 2008 to December 2009 for the appellant, while setting aside the penalty and duty beyond the normal limitation period. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs.60,00,000 within 12 weeks despite claiming no financial difficulty. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments regarding the interpretation of excisable goods, applicability of a Supreme Court decision, and validity of the Board's Circular, emphasizing the revenue's case based on the amended definition of excisable goods. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:31:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242842 The Tribunal upheld the duty amounting to Rs.69,35,257 confirmed for the period May 2008 to December 2009 for the appellant, while setting aside the penalty and duty beyond the normal limitation period. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs.60,00,000 within 12 weeks despite claiming no financial difficulty. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments regarding the interpretation of excisable goods, applicability of a Supreme Court decision, and validity of the Board's Circular, emphasizing the revenue's case based on the amended definition of excisable goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242842