<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1056 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242840</link>
    <description>Complete waiver of predeposit was denied because the appellant, a job worker, had cleared goods without the raw material supplier&#039;s undertaking and in breach of Notification No. 83/94-CE conditions. The Tribunal found that the factual foundation required to rely on the cited precedent was not established, so no prima facie case for total waiver was made out. Partial relief was granted instead: deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 was directed, and on compliance the balance predeposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived with recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:30:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1056 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242840</link>
      <description>Complete waiver of predeposit was denied because the appellant, a job worker, had cleared goods without the raw material supplier&#039;s undertaking and in breach of Notification No. 83/94-CE conditions. The Tribunal found that the factual foundation required to rely on the cited precedent was not established, so no prima facie case for total waiver was made out. Partial relief was granted instead: deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 was directed, and on compliance the balance predeposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived with recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>