https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242834 The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments regarding jurisdiction and directed the Commissioner to reconsider the service tax liability for construction services provided at various locations. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Commissioner to review the denial of abatement benefit, address the appellant's defense pleas, and examine the discrepancy in the service tax amount recovered and deposited. The case was remanded for a fresh examination focusing on these key aspects. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:33:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242834 The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments regarding jurisdiction and directed the Commissioner to reconsider the service tax liability for construction services provided at various locations. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Commissioner to review the denial of abatement benefit, address the appellant's defense pleas, and examine the discrepancy in the service tax amount recovered and deposited. The case was remanded for a fresh examination focusing on these key aspects. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242834