<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1046 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242830</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal remanded the case back to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh review, emphasizing the need to consider all documentary evidence presented by the appellant. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and instructed a hearing for the appellant before a new adjudication order is issued. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing an opportunity for a more thorough examination of the classification and tax liability issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:32:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1046 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242830</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal remanded the case back to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh review, emphasizing the need to consider all documentary evidence presented by the appellant. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and instructed a hearing for the appellant before a new adjudication order is issued. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing an opportunity for a more thorough examination of the classification and tax liability issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>