https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242826 Revisional and inherent jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 482 CrPC is limited at the stage of framing charge under Section 228; the court must only see whether the material on record, taken at face value, discloses the ingredients of the offence and raises a strong suspicion, not conduct a trial-like appraisal of evidence. Quashing is justified only in rare cases where the allegations are patently absurd, inherently improbable, barred by law, or amount to abuse of process. A civil dispute does not justify quashing where the materials disclose criminality. On the alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, the suicide note and related materials, if accepted at face value, disclosed circumstances capable of abetment, so the charge was to be restored and the trial permitted to proceed. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242826 Revisional and inherent jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 482 CrPC is limited at the stage of framing charge under Section 228; the court must only see whether the material on record, taken at face value, discloses the ingredients of the offence and raises a strong suspicion, not conduct a trial-like appraisal of evidence. Quashing is justified only in rare cases where the allegations are patently absurd, inherently improbable, barred by law, or amount to abuse of process. A civil dispute does not justify quashing where the materials disclose criminality. On the alleged abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, the suicide note and related materials, if accepted at face value, disclosed circumstances capable of abetment, so the charge was to be restored and the trial permitted to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242826