<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1020 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242804</link>
    <description>In preventive detention, all relevant and vital material bearing on the Detaining Authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction must be placed before it. A prior bail order imposing stringent conditions was material because it affected the detenu&#039;s legal status and antecedent conduct, and failure to consider it amounted to non-application of mind. The detenu&#039;s replies to show cause notices were also vital because the notices were relied upon in the detention grounds; considering the notices without the replies created an incomplete and unfair appreciation of the material. On that basis, withholding either category of document vitiated the detention order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1020 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242804</link>
      <description>In preventive detention, all relevant and vital material bearing on the Detaining Authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction must be placed before it. A prior bail order imposing stringent conditions was material because it affected the detenu&#039;s legal status and antecedent conduct, and failure to consider it amounted to non-application of mind. The detenu&#039;s replies to show cause notices were also vital because the notices were relied upon in the detention grounds; considering the notices without the replies created an incomplete and unfair appreciation of the material. On that basis, withholding either category of document vitiated the detention order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>