<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1006 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242790</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore directed the appellants to predeposit Rs. 15,56,000 within six weeks, acknowledging the plea of limitation raised by the appellants regarding excisability of commodities. Compliance would result in a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for penalties and the remaining duty demanded, subject to due compliance. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reflects a balanced approach, considering legal and procedural aspects while upholding excise law principles and compliance requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1006 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242790</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore directed the appellants to predeposit Rs. 15,56,000 within six weeks, acknowledging the plea of limitation raised by the appellants regarding excisability of commodities. Compliance would result in a waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery for penalties and the remaining duty demanded, subject to due compliance. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reflects a balanced approach, considering legal and procedural aspects while upholding excise law principles and compliance requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>