<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (4) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161415</link>
    <description>A statutory selection process is invalid where a member of the selection board is himself a candidate and participates in assessing rival candidates or framing the select list, because the conflict between interest and duty creates a reasonable likelihood of bias. The principle that no person should be a judge in his own cause applies even to administrative selection, and actual proof of bias is not required. Natural justice also governs administrative decisions with serious civil consequences, so a tainted foundational recommendation cannot be cured by later departmental or commission-level review. Where senior and junior scale selections form one integrated process, the defect may vitiate the entire select list.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (4) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161415</link>
      <description>A statutory selection process is invalid where a member of the selection board is himself a candidate and participates in assessing rival candidates or framing the select list, because the conflict between interest and duty creates a reasonable likelihood of bias. The principle that no person should be a judge in his own cause applies even to administrative selection, and actual proof of bias is not required. Natural justice also governs administrative decisions with serious civil consequences, so a tainted foundational recommendation cannot be cured by later departmental or commission-level review. Where senior and junior scale selections form one integrated process, the defect may vitiate the entire select list.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>