https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242782 The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the 50% pre-deposit requirement. The main issue was the liability to pay Service Tax for joint development of a residential complex. The Tribunal found the pre-deposit requirement reasonable, allowing the consultant to deposit the amount. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a decision on the merits, with the condition that the appellant must deposit 50% of the Service Tax demanded within eight weeks. en-us Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:06:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242782 The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the 50% pre-deposit requirement. The main issue was the liability to pay Service Tax for joint development of a residential complex. The Tribunal found the pre-deposit requirement reasonable, allowing the consultant to deposit the amount. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a decision on the merits, with the condition that the appellant must deposit 50% of the Service Tax demanded within eight weeks. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242782