<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 985 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242769</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of brought forward and set off loss by the ld. CIT (Appeals). The Tribunal held in favor of the assessee, emphasizing its entitlement to carry forward the excess expenditure on charity over income for future set off, despite the income being exempt u/s 11. The Tribunal directed the AO to reevaluate and recalculate the correct amount of loss for the current and earlier years, setting aside the previous order for proper computation and carry forward of losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 985 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242769</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of brought forward and set off loss by the ld. CIT (Appeals). The Tribunal held in favor of the assessee, emphasizing its entitlement to carry forward the excess expenditure on charity over income for future set off, despite the income being exempt u/s 11. The Tribunal directed the AO to reevaluate and recalculate the correct amount of loss for the current and earlier years, setting aside the previous order for proper computation and carry forward of losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>