<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 984 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on two issues. Firstly, the loss on share transactions was deemed a normal business loss rather than speculative. Secondly, the addition under Section 68 regarding unsecured loans was removed as the transactions were proven genuine with adequate evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 984 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on two issues. Firstly, the loss on share transactions was deemed a normal business loss rather than speculative. Secondly, the addition under Section 68 regarding unsecured loans was removed as the transactions were proven genuine with adequate evidence. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>