<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 973 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242757</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside additions made by the assessing officer and CIT(A) regarding discrepancies in sale price valuation and unsecured loan amounts. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and proper verification in tax assessments for a fair determination of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 973 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242757</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside additions made by the assessing officer and CIT(A) regarding discrepancies in sale price valuation and unsecured loan amounts. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence and proper verification in tax assessments for a fair determination of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>