<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 968 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242752</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the benefit of Notification No. 94/2004-Cus is not barred if the facility of rebate on duty paid on finished goods cleared for export is availed. The case was remanded to the Commissioner to verify the fulfillment of Condition Nos. 9 and 10. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation aimed to ensure a non-discriminatory application of the notification, in line with legal principles and past judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 968 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242752</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the benefit of Notification No. 94/2004-Cus is not barred if the facility of rebate on duty paid on finished goods cleared for export is availed. The case was remanded to the Commissioner to verify the fulfillment of Condition Nos. 9 and 10. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation aimed to ensure a non-discriminatory application of the notification, in line with legal principles and past judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>