<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 926 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242710</link>
    <description>Commercial prudence in a share-swap transaction approved by the FIPB cannot be rejected merely on a subjective view, but the assessee must still substantiate the long-term capital loss claim with documentary evidence; the matter was remanded for limited verification of the cost of acquisition evidence. For set-off of capital losses, short-term capital loss from STT-paid transactions was held comparable with short-term capital gains from non-STT transactions because the statutory phrase &quot;under similar computation made&quot; refers to computation under the capital gains scheme, not to the rate structure. The set-off claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 926 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242710</link>
      <description>Commercial prudence in a share-swap transaction approved by the FIPB cannot be rejected merely on a subjective view, but the assessee must still substantiate the long-term capital loss claim with documentary evidence; the matter was remanded for limited verification of the cost of acquisition evidence. For set-off of capital losses, short-term capital loss from STT-paid transactions was held comparable with short-term capital gains from non-STT transactions because the statutory phrase &quot;under similar computation made&quot; refers to computation under the capital gains scheme, not to the rate structure. The set-off claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>