<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 923 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the District Valuation Officer&#039;s valuation under section 50C, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt the property&#039;s value at Rs. 3,87,60,443 as the full consideration received. Regarding the cost of acquisition, the Tribunal determined the indexed cost as Rs. 1,13,14,285 as of 01.04.1986, allowing the benefit under section 54. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:48:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 923 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the District Valuation Officer&#039;s valuation under section 50C, directing the Assessing Officer to adopt the property&#039;s value at Rs. 3,87,60,443 as the full consideration received. Regarding the cost of acquisition, the Tribunal determined the indexed cost as Rs. 1,13,14,285 as of 01.04.1986, allowing the benefit under section 54. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>