<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 914 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242698</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80IB(10) of the IT Act. The ITAT found that the assessee had control over the land development and sale as per the terms of the development agreement, meeting the conditions set in the Shakti Corporation case. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 914 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242698</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80IB(10) of the IT Act. The ITAT found that the assessee had control over the land development and sale as per the terms of the development agreement, meeting the conditions set in the Shakti Corporation case. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>