<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 897 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242681</link>
    <description>The appeal by a General Surgeon against the disallowance of 5% of Medicine and Disposables (M&amp;amp;D) expenses for the assessment year 2008-2009 was partly allowed. The CIT(A) reduced the disallowance from 20% to 5%, but the Tribunal found flat rate disallowances arbitrary and imposed a round sum disallowance of Rs. 1 lakh to encourage proper record-keeping. The appellant&#039;s argument of recovering the entire M&amp;amp;D expenditure from patients was not fully accepted due to insufficient records on medicine consumption. The Tribunal upheld the need for records and modified the disallowance amount in the appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 897 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242681</link>
      <description>The appeal by a General Surgeon against the disallowance of 5% of Medicine and Disposables (M&amp;amp;D) expenses for the assessment year 2008-2009 was partly allowed. The CIT(A) reduced the disallowance from 20% to 5%, but the Tribunal found flat rate disallowances arbitrary and imposed a round sum disallowance of Rs. 1 lakh to encourage proper record-keeping. The appellant&#039;s argument of recovering the entire M&amp;amp;D expenditure from patients was not fully accepted due to insufficient records on medicine consumption. The Tribunal upheld the need for records and modified the disallowance amount in the appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>