<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 896 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242680</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the disallowance under section 14A being restricted to 5% of the dividend income. The Tribunal found that Rule 8D was not applicable for the assessment year but upheld the disallowance as reasonable, directing the Assessing Officer to make the adjustment based on the Tribunal&#039;s determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 896 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242680</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the disallowance under section 14A being restricted to 5% of the dividend income. The Tribunal found that Rule 8D was not applicable for the assessment year but upheld the disallowance as reasonable, directing the Assessing Officer to make the adjustment based on the Tribunal&#039;s determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>