<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 893 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on disallowance under sections 40(a)(ia) and 14A, emphasizing genuine expenses and no penalty for technical errors. Regarding penalty on liquidated damages, the Tribunal found the explanation bonafide, leading to deletion of penalty based on relevant case laws. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, highlighting the significance of bonafide explanations and minor errors in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 893 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on disallowance under sections 40(a)(ia) and 14A, emphasizing genuine expenses and no penalty for technical errors. Regarding penalty on liquidated damages, the Tribunal found the explanation bonafide, leading to deletion of penalty based on relevant case laws. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, highlighting the significance of bonafide explanations and minor errors in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>