<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 888 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the penalty under section 271 G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06. It was determined that no specific requisition under section 92D(3) was issued and not complied with, as required for the penalty to be levied. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal precedents and the necessity of a valid requisition to avoid imposing undue burdens on taxpayers. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 888 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the penalty under section 271 G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06. It was determined that no specific requisition under section 92D(3) was issued and not complied with, as required for the penalty to be levied. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal precedents and the necessity of a valid requisition to avoid imposing undue burdens on taxpayers. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>