<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 886 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242670</link>
    <description>Fees for in-house employee training and market-development training paid to a UK resident are taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK treaty only if the services make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, meaning the recipient is enabled to apply the technology itself. General training, even if specialised or useful, does not satisfy that treaty threshold unless it results in a transfer of technology. On the stated facts, the training was of a general nature and did not enable the assessee to apply any technical knowledge; the revenue also failed to establish that the treaty condition was met. Accordingly, the domestic charging provision could not be invoked, and the withholding demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 886 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242670</link>
      <description>Fees for in-house employee training and market-development training paid to a UK resident are taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK treaty only if the services make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes, meaning the recipient is enabled to apply the technology itself. General training, even if specialised or useful, does not satisfy that treaty threshold unless it results in a transfer of technology. On the stated facts, the training was of a general nature and did not enable the assessee to apply any technical knowledge; the revenue also failed to establish that the treaty condition was met. Accordingly, the domestic charging provision could not be invoked, and the withholding demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>