<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 883 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242667</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the quantum appeal, setting aside previous decisions denying exemption under section 54 for the cost of improvement in a new house property. The ITAT emphasized that any capital expenditure to make the property habitable should be included in the cost of the new asset for exemption purposes. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with directions to conduct factual verifications and provide a speaking order after allowing the assessee another opportunity for a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 883 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242667</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the quantum appeal, setting aside previous decisions denying exemption under section 54 for the cost of improvement in a new house property. The ITAT emphasized that any capital expenditure to make the property habitable should be included in the cost of the new asset for exemption purposes. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, with directions to conduct factual verifications and provide a speaking order after allowing the assessee another opportunity for a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>