<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 882 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of loss/depreciation on the block of assets for the assessment year 2003-04. The decision was based on the lack of evidence demonstrating the assets were used for business purposes in the relevant assessment year, leading to the denial of depreciation claims. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of assets being actively used for business to qualify for depreciation on a block of assets, ultimately resulting in the rejection of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 882 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of loss/depreciation on the block of assets for the assessment year 2003-04. The decision was based on the lack of evidence demonstrating the assets were used for business purposes in the relevant assessment year, leading to the denial of depreciation claims. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of assets being actively used for business to qualify for depreciation on a block of assets, ultimately resulting in the rejection of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>