<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 856 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty order imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(A). The decision was based on the lack of conclusive evidence for conscious concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee, as per legal interpretations and precedents cited during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 856 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty order imposed by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(A). The decision was based on the lack of conclusive evidence for conscious concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars by the assessee, as per legal interpretations and precedents cited during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>