<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment. The decision highlighted the necessity of verifying ownership and compliance with section 54F before granting exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough examination and adherence to the law in determining the eligibility of the assessee for the claimed deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment. The decision highlighted the necessity of verifying ownership and compliance with section 54F before granting exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough examination and adherence to the law in determining the eligibility of the assessee for the claimed deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>