<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow broken period interest on a protective basis, rejecting the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s finding that the A.O.&#039;s orders were erroneous. The Tribunal agreed with the A.O.&#039;s rationale, supported by legal precedents, emphasizing that protective assessments should not create alternative assessments within one. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s orders and restored those of the A.O., affirming the validity of the original assessments for the relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to disallow broken period interest on a protective basis, rejecting the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s finding that the A.O.&#039;s orders were erroneous. The Tribunal agreed with the A.O.&#039;s rationale, supported by legal precedents, emphasizing that protective assessments should not create alternative assessments within one. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s orders and restored those of the A.O., affirming the validity of the original assessments for the relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>