<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 847 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the AO&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IA(4) was valid. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT could not invoke Section 263 based on a differing interpretation. Subsequent orders stemming from the annulled Section 263 order were also invalidated. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeals were successful, confirming their entitlement to the deduction under Section 80IA(4).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 847 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the AO&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IA(4) was valid. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT could not invoke Section 263 based on a differing interpretation. Subsequent orders stemming from the annulled Section 263 order were also invalidated. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeals were successful, confirming their entitlement to the deduction under Section 80IA(4).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>