<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 835 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242619</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition on the undisclosed investment in the fixed deposit, as the investment was made through disclosed accounts and was not unexplained. The tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision-making process, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2014 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 835 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242619</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition on the undisclosed investment in the fixed deposit, as the investment was made through disclosed accounts and was not unexplained. The tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision-making process, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>