<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 940 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161409</link>
    <description>An arbitration clause incorporated by clear reference into a contract binds the parties where the adopted terms are consistent with the express bargain and intelligible. On that basis, the objection that no written arbitration agreement existed failed. A further challenge that the foreign arbitration agreement and award were contrary to public policy also failed, because a clause requiring disputes to be referred to arbitration does not amount to an absolute bar on legal proceedings and is not invalid merely because arbitration is to be conducted abroad. The parties&#039; knowing participation in the arbitration and failure to object at the proper stage further supported enforceability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 940 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161409</link>
      <description>An arbitration clause incorporated by clear reference into a contract binds the parties where the adopted terms are consistent with the express bargain and intelligible. On that basis, the objection that no written arbitration agreement existed failed. A further challenge that the foreign arbitration agreement and award were contrary to public policy also failed, because a clause requiring disputes to be referred to arbitration does not amount to an absolute bar on legal proceedings and is not invalid merely because arbitration is to be conducted abroad. The parties&#039; knowing participation in the arbitration and failure to object at the proper stage further supported enforceability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>