<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1496 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161406</link>
    <description>Section 11 arbitration power is limited to disputes governed by an arbitration agreement within the meaning of section 7 between the parties to that dispute. A non-party to the invoked arbitration clause cannot be impleaded and sent to arbitration merely because it has a separate arbitration arrangement with one contracting party. Where a section 11 petition seeks reference against both a contracting party and a stranger to the agreement, the court must exclude the stranger or confine the reference to disputes covered by the relevant arbitration clause. On the facts, the claims against the appellant arose, if at all, from a different loan agreement, so the reference could stand only against the developer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1496 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161406</link>
      <description>Section 11 arbitration power is limited to disputes governed by an arbitration agreement within the meaning of section 7 between the parties to that dispute. A non-party to the invoked arbitration clause cannot be impleaded and sent to arbitration merely because it has a separate arbitration arrangement with one contracting party. Where a section 11 petition seeks reference against both a contracting party and a stranger to the agreement, the court must exclude the stranger or confine the reference to disputes covered by the relevant arbitration clause. On the facts, the claims against the appellant arose, if at all, from a different loan agreement, so the reference could stand only against the developer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>