https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161403 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a repatriation order, finding it legal and within jurisdiction. The petitioners' claims for absorption in the Commercial Tax Department were rejected as their transfer was temporary and not covered by statutory provisions. The court emphasized that legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel could not override statutory rules, and no mandamus could compel amending the Service Rules, 1983. The court held that the petitioners were aware of the service conditions and could not challenge them after benefiting from them for years. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161403 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a repatriation order, finding it legal and within jurisdiction. The petitioners' claims for absorption in the Commercial Tax Department were rejected as their transfer was temporary and not covered by statutory provisions. The court emphasized that legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel could not override statutory rules, and no mandamus could compel amending the Service Rules, 1983. The court held that the petitioners were aware of the service conditions and could not challenge them after benefiting from them for years. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161403